Search for: "Clark v City of New York" Results 181 - 200 of 291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
An extract was reproduced in New York Magazine here. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
Challenges for General Counsel – http://bit.ly/IJBPtu (Paul Mandell) The Trade Politics of Cloud Computing | Slaw - bit.ly/HSEWVl (Jack Newton) Understanding and Using Certificates in Exchange 2010 – Part One - bit.ly/IfbXFl  – Part Two - bit.ly/HKV2fi (Casper Manes) Unmasking Anonymous Internet Speech in New York - bit.ly/Hzga81 (Scott Himes) Will Email Create A New Digital Divide in Your Business? [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Clark v Schriro, 2012 NY Slip Op 00118, Appellate Division, First Department Jesse Clark filed a CPLR Article 78 petition “in the nature of mandamus” seeking to compel the New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings [OATH] to... [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  So far as books by Justices are concerned, this new offering is more refined, extensive, and current than what had appeared previously in Fenton Martin and Robert Goehlert’s The U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
But last week there were fresh allegations ahead of the “Sun on Sunday’s” first issue, as court documents revealed NI’s email deletion policy and new reports of possible US “victims” of phone hacking, including Charlotte Church’s Los Angeles agent and New York publicist. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Michael O'Hear
s, New York City’s rate has dropped. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:34 pm by admin
In 1984, the Supreme Court held in Clark v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
Circuit opinion of Seven-Sky v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is especially so given the Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. [read post]