Search for: "Clark v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
To be clear, whether or not Breadberry was negligent, and plaintiff claims Breadberry was negligent, the court concludes that Breadberry’s liability is also vicarious, pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
As the South Dakota Supreme Court recently described in Kirlin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
Superior Court, 62 Cal App. 4th 155, (1998); Olam v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
V. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm
” In the Lancaster County case of Clark v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:23 am
A different three-judge panel of the same court reached the same conclusion in Allan Jake Clark v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
” In Clark v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
” In Clark v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
" The case was Wheeler v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
Clark (1985) 38 Cal.3d 355 (California Supreme Court)). [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Pierce County, supra.The Supreme Court went on to explain that[d]issatisfied with the County's disclosures, Nissen sued the County in Thurston County Superior Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
On the other hand, a claim of a fraudulent transfer, at common law, is commonly addressed by a court of equity, see Smith v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:05 am
ANDREW FAUCETT V. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
A grandparent . . . of a child residing in this State may make application before the Superior Court . . . for an order for visitation. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
” If he lives in the USA he may be aware that the original and authoritative and therefore binding (including upon the Supreme Court itself) Supreme Court precedent Worcester v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Khela (B.C.C.A., Nov. 9, 2011) (34609) Mar. 27, 2014 Federal inmates can access provincial superior courts. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am
Superior Court, No. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:41 pm
Clarke, R (on the application of) v Cardiff University [2009] EWHC 2148 (Admin) was a judicial review of Cardiff University Law School brought by a BVC student from 2004/5, Ms Clarke. [read post]
