Search for: "Clark v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
A grandparent . . . of a child residing in this State may make application before the Superior Court . . . for an order for visitation. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s… [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
” If he lives in the USA he may be aware that the original and authoritative and therefore binding (including upon the Supreme Court itself) Supreme Court precedent Worcester v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Khela (B.C.C.A., Nov. 9, 2011) (34609) Mar. 27, 2014 Federal inmates can access provincial superior courts. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:41 pm
Clarke, R (on the application of) v Cardiff University [2009] EWHC 2148 (Admin) was a judicial review of Cardiff University Law School brought by a BVC student from 2004/5, Ms Clarke. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Superior Court, supra; Mark A. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm
Superior Court of Cal., 480 U.S. 102, 113, 107 S. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
Hogoboom "Although the parties' agreement provided that the decision of the arbitrator can be appealed as a judgment of the Superior Court, the parties must seek initial review of these awards in the trial court. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 11:34 am
(Pa. 1950); Clark v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Supreme Court explained in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
G.D. v. [read post]
Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Judging Sex & The En Banc Opinion That Reversed The Rape Shield Killing Ruling
17 May 2012, 7:06 am
Quite to the contrary, the Court held in Lucas…that the trial court must balance the state’s interest against the defendant’s interest on a case-by-case basis, and neither interest is superior per se. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
State of Indiana (NFP) David Paul Clark v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:42 am
Griffith v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
The text of the Court of Appeals' decision in Colt v New Jersey Transit Corporation is set out below: Colt v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
The text of the Court of Appeals' decision in Colt v New Jersey Transit Corporation is set out below: Colt v New Jersey Tr. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
The court stated that it took this approach based upon the Superior Court’s decision in the case of Pittsburgh Neurosurgery Associates v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
That year it reversed the Supreme Court of Georgia in Jones v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 1:19 pm
Pornography * Clark v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 3:23 am
Canada On 20 March 2025, the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario dismissed the defendant’s anti-SLAPP motion in the defamation case of Solmar Inc. v. [read post]
