Search for: "Clemente v. Clemente"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 5:55 am
City of San Clemente. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:02 pm
[Reeder v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
The Stolen Valor case, United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:50 pm
Pereida v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:04 am
Gyger v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:49 am
In a recent decision in the matter Alliance Bernstein, L.P. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm
These briefs (lead author Paul Clement) are exceptionally well done and clear. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:40 pm
Despite the Supreme Court making the Guidelines advisory in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:44 am
The one most recently resolved by the Court was Financial Industries Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
Presumably only one of the five counsel of record for petitioners will present oral argument--if I had to guess, it'll be Paul Clement or Noel Francisco. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 4:52 pm
Of note, the labels' appellate team now includes former US Solicitor General Paul Clement, now a partner at King & Spalding.Tenenbaum's defense team has also indicated that it will appeal, arguing that even the reduced award is unconstitutionally excessive.Record Labels' appellate brief in Sony v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:22 pm
In the 1963 case Brady v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 4:03 am
Clementvision, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
Here's the audio and transcript for today's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:16 am
This individualist conception of popular sovereignty was articulated by Chief Justice John Jay and Justice James Wilson in the Supreme Court’s first great constitutional case of Chishom v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:21 am
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. appears unlikely (American Express Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:47 am
In Ford v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 6:14 pm
Perry about California's gay marriage ban and U.S. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:57 am
This is a logical extension of the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]