Search for: "Com. v. Hand, T."
Results 181 - 200
of 519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 6:14 am
”) Lewis, on the other hand, had gone to a jury trial, and then appealed; wasn’t all that, the defense argued, sufficient to show that he wasn’t “voluntarily” agreeing to the outcome in his case? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:38 am
The first case is State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 2:45 pm
By Eric Goldman National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
After the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:37 pm
That was clear after the oral argument Tuesday in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:30 am
If it was merely “potentially useful,” on the other hand — you can’t show whether it would have helped the defendant or not — the defendant has to prove that the state acted in bad faith in destroying the evidence. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:03 am
Let’s start with US v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:11 am
They tell people to show their hands, approach, observe defendant put his hands into his pockets a number of times. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:16 am
For sentences handed down after that date where PRC wasn’t properly imposed, the court has to conduct a hearing, but the only question is whether PRC is to be imposed. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
On the other hand, the period form the early 2000s produced a sort of golden age for international soft law. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:52 am
A more usual decision from the 6th is US v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:29 am
”Kim Kreis, et al. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:54 am
Thompson talks to Starling, then goes back to informant, and engages in a hand-to-hand transaction. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:42 am
On Monday the Court accepted certiorari in Connick v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
Com., 460 U.S. 1, 24-25, 103 S. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:49 am
” We shook hands. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
State v. [read post]
