Search for: "Com. v. Price"
Results 181 - 200
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
George v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
See Law 360, December 20, 2013 at http://www.law360.com/articles/497957. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
See Law 360, December 20, 2013 at http://www.law360.com/articles/497957. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
See Mock v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
The litigation arises out of the IPO laddering scandal from the dot com era. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 3:21 pm
(Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Outside of this directive, the agencies generally have taken the view that prior enforcement of the antitrust laws was too lax and that the narrow focus on more traditional antitrust harms (such as higher prices, reduced output, or lower quality) has been too narrow. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Price: Core Tier: $129/user/mo (includes 1 user); Elite Tier: $499/mo (includes 6 users); custom pricing for larger teams. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am
(R.A.V. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
Mujo v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
Compare Bland v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
The competition concern is that this pursuit of portfolio returns can disincentivize “business stealing” between the companies in which they have invested.[3] For example, a company might ordinarily lower price or seek innovations to take market share from its competitor. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
This is particularly true when a company’s share price goes “underwater” shortly after public offering. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
Mike Masnick blew open the story on Dajaz1.com, which ICE seized on an ex parte basis, conducted secret proceedings for a year, and then gave back the domain name with no explanation. * Graduated Response. [read post]
