Search for: "Commonwealth v. Person, S." Results 181 - 200 of 2,373
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
In other words, Massachusetts is stuck with the costs associated with tobacco consumption but without the revenue from taxing tobacco products. [1] According to the state’s own Multi-Agency Illicit Tobacco Task Force, there was an increase in the smuggling of flavored cigarettes (as well as other flavored tobacco and nicotine products): “The increase in seizures of flavored ENDS products and menthol cigarettes combined with the decrease in revenue for cigarettes and OTP likely… [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
Kohler: Recognition of status and free movement of persons in the EU In Case C-490/20, V.M.A., the ECJ obliged Bulgaria to recognise the Spanish birth certificate of a child in which two female EU citizens, married to each other, were named as the child’s parents, as far as the implementation of the free movement of persons under EU law was concerned, but left the determination of the family law effects of the certificate to Bulgarian law. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:25 pm by David Kopel
But England's brief period as a commonwealth failed, and  degenerated into Oliver Cromwell's military dictatorship. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am by Frank Cranmer
John Picton, Modern Law Review: Lehtimäki v Cooper: Duty and Jurisdiction in Charity Law: on the UKSC judgment on the status of members of charitable companies. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm by Unknown
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html Oertwich v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:50 pm by Ray Giblett (AU) and Timothy Chan (AU)
The Court seemed to agree with FCA v Arch and the primary judgment in adopting this test, and not utilising the ‘but for’ approach in the case of Orient-Express Hotels Ltd v Assicurazioni Generali SA [2010] Lloyd’s Rep IR 531, which the UK Supreme Court held was wrongly decided. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
But the gap in the 13th Amendment’s protections has also left a disturbing residue in the jurisprudence of prisoners’ rights.In 1871, the Supreme Court of Virginia made this clear in Ruffin v Commonwealth. [read post]