Search for: "Commonwealth v. Reason, T."
Results 181 - 200
of 1,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 8:55 pm
Basically, this means that a judge must find that a substantial basis exists to believe that evidence of criminal activity may reasonably be expected to be located in the location searched “at the time the search warrant issues” (Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” He stressed the measures already taken by the Wisconsin legislature to respond to the pandemic and argued that the district court was simply complaining that “the state hasn’t done enough. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
In a statement, the Australian federal police said although commonwealth prosecutors advised there were “reasonable prospects” of convictions in relation to two charges, they had decided not to prosecute due to “public interest” considerations. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 11:50 am
[Chief Justice Ralph Gants may be dead, but that is not stopping him from authoring opinions. ] Today the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts decided Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
(See ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm
” Instead, Ginsburg began a clerkship with a federal judge in New York, who hired her only after the law professor who recommended her promised that he would supply a male lawyer if Ginsburg didn’t work out. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
For obvious reasons, I hope that I am wrong and Jack is right. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:46 pm
[I]n Lutz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:33 pm
(See City of Ladue v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
(For reasons dis [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
See Commonwealth Sci. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
I’ve discussed the continuing litigation between White Oak Power Constructors v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm
See Burwell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Decision on Preliminary Injunction by Richard Vetstein on Scribd [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Way back in 1983, in Bearden v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:49 am
Hindel v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:05 am
The survey showed some degree of recognition of the shape and a level of association with JLR, but not recognition of the shapes as trade marks, i.e. as designating the goods of JLR and no other's.For those reasons, the Court was satisfied that the Hearing Officer had carefully and fairly assessed the survey evidence in a way which disclosed no error of principle.CommentWhat this case essentially confirms is the approach previously adopted by Arnold J (as he then was) in… [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:25 am
According to Commonwealth v. [read post]
