Search for: "Community Health United Home Care, LLC" Results 181 - 191 of 191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:59 pm
During his 18 years at Justice, Sabin prosecuted foreign corrupt practices, procurement fraud, and health care fraud cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:23 am
  David Harlow The Harlow Group LLC Health Care Law and Consulting Interview of Donald Berwick, CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement October 28, 2008 David Harlow:  This is David Harlow of HealthBlawg, and I have with me today Don Berwick, CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
Nations issued his decision Jan. 18, 2008. *** Premier Home Health Care Service, Inc. d/b/a Metropolitan Home Health Care (22-CA-28089; 353 NLRB No. 3) Elmwood Park and Weehawken, NJ Sept. 11, 2008. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:08 pm
Long-term care can occur at home, in an assisted living facility, in a nursing home, or in the community through special programs, but no matter how or where it is provided, it can be very expensive. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IP finance),Google Image Labeler… community intellectual property cops? [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
This is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
All case summaries below  are from the FindLaw Weekly Opinion Summaries, August 27 through August 31,  2007. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Kentucky River Community Care, 532 U.S. 706 (2001). [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board adopted the administrative law judge's recommended order and held that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by unilaterally implementing changes in the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment of its unit employees represented by Teamsters Local 270. [read post]