Search for: "Connell v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2007, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:44 pm
” On April 14, 2014, Judge Pohl issued an Order in the USS Cole case, United States v. al Nashiri, stating that the government had to turn over ten categories of information relevant to Mr. al Nashiri’s time in the CIA’s RDI program, in effect revealing to the defense the entire history of his torture. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:53 am
But any confidence that she may have felt was short-lived, as both Moskowitz and then Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell (representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of Alvarez) also faced a barrage of questions from all sides. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
In its May 2022 ruling in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:10 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:18 am
Connell
U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Mr Connell and Ms Lynn appealed. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
To be sure, the United States Supreme Court case of Van Orden v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:36 am
The facts of Grosvenor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:40 am
In 1984, the California Supreme Court ruled unequivocally in Hartzell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
Union v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:48 pm
Matter of O'Connell v McDermott, 915 NYS2d 143. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Vanessa O’Connell of the Wall Street Journal chatted with Lisa Blatt, who set the record for the most Supreme Court cases argued by a woman (thirty) when she argued Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:24 pm
Graham; AmosGuiora; Samuel V. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:33 am
Reviewing the findings of the Appellate Division, we see: "A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 may be established "either by the defendant's alleged deceit or by an alleged chronic, extreme pattern of legal delinquency by the defendant" (emphasis supplied) (Knecht v Tusa, 15 AD3d 626, 627 [2005]; see O'Connell v Kerson, 291 AD2d 386, 387 [2002]; see also Bridges v 725 Riverside Dr., 119 AD2d 789 [1986]; Trepel… [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am
He speaks to that briefly, and turns, at long last, to the arraignment of the accused in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
In chapter 16, Marc H Greenberg addresses the case of the Estate of Elvis Presley v Russen and the right of publicity. [read post]
