Search for: "Cook v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2012, 5:59 am by John H Curley
Arbitrator Das’ award can be found at the APWU website here.California Supreme Court determines courts cannot compel arbitration if the issue conflicts with the Education CodeIn United Teachers of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am by Susan Brenner
[Sayer] was convicted in Maine Superior Court for stalking the victim [who] obtained a protection from abuse order against [him] and in February 2008 [Sayer] was convicted of violating that protective order. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102 (1987), the Court held that specific jurisdiction was present over the French defendant. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, in Zehl v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm by Georgialee Lang
It is noteworthy that the Court in R.E.Q. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am by admin
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am by admin
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:51 am
“In the absence of any decision from the Court of Appeal, I am persuaded to follow the decision of the Divisional Court in Desbiens [v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Henderson of the Superior Court of Justice dated July 6, 2010, with reasons reported at (2010), 76 C.C.L.T. (3d) 92. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:38 am by Eric
Bender, 09 CH 18628 (filed 6/10/09) (all in Cook County Court) * Henry v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]