Search for: "Cooper v. Clarke"
Results 181 - 200
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decision expected to factor in the case against the department, Clark v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Its social network has vastly more users than Google+ (800 million v 62 million, but even larger lead in active users), and, in most respects, more social functionality. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
In the Courts On Monday 12 December 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Cooper v Turrell [2011] EWHC 3269 (QB), an assessment of damages in a libel, breach of confidence and misuse of private information case. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
Another case, Duncan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
“Miss Sharon Clark complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined “Dad dies trying to save daughter”, published in the Maidenhead Advertiser on 21 July 2011, included a photograph of her daughter without consent in breach of Clause 6 (Children) of the Editors’ Code of Practice. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Hill and Gertz v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:53 am
" (Citing Clark v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:18 am
Griffith v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
The short of it is that under the Supreme Court's 1984 ruling in Clark v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
.” (The state’s case is Arizona v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
HemCon, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (Patently-O) (Reexamination Alert) (IPBiz) CAFC: Construing claim constructions: Cordis Corporation v Boston Scientific (Patently-O) (IPBiz) Kimberly-Clark: CAFC loses an opportunity to address law of preliminary injunctions: Kimberly Clark v First Quality Baby Products (IPBiz) The Federal Circuit’s rare opportunity to protect the public from agency misconduct: In re Jeff Lovin (Patently-O) District Court C D California:… [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
The Court of Appeal in R. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
This will be heard by Lords Phillips, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson on Wednesday 27 July 2011. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Kimberly-Clark fails to show infringement on appeal: Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd (Patentology) Australia and New Zealand to cooperate to deliver simplified patent filing and examination process (IPKat) Brazil The great number 10 – Jalapão will become the 10th GI granted to a national product in Brazil (IPtango) Yee-haa! [read post]
