Search for: "Corporation of America v. Marks"
Results 181 - 200
of 727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
Sandford, and Plessy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– new process regarding ‘essence of the invention’ publication (America-Israel Patent Law) Israel restores Australian Patent office’s kashrut certificate (The IP Factor) (America-Israel Patent Law) Whose invention is it? [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In Sheraton Corporation of America v Sheraton Motels Ltd [1964] RPC 202, the US hotel chain had an arguable case to justify an interlocutory injunction against use of its mark; the goodwill was based on the fact that customers living in the United Kingdom booked rooms in the plaintiff’s hotels through the plaintiff’s London office or through UK-based travel agents. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am
The law was promulgated pursuant to the Contract With America. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
—Mahatma Gandhi 1Lloyd’s America v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
ALLENS NATURALLY refused registration over ALEN AMERICAS for cleaning preparations (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps EB’s Fine Handbags – Seattle seller caught with 33,700 fake handbags (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I've now had a chance to review the complaint in Van Etten v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:27 am
C.A.W. - Canada (1996), 71 C.P.R. (3d) 348 (F.C.T.D.) (”the Michelin case”), the defendant attempted to unionize the workers of Michelin North America (Canada) and handed out pamphlets to employees parodying the Michelin corporate logo, namely the Michelin Tire Man, a beaming marshmallow-like rotund figure composed of tires. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
The vote by the shorthanded SEC is a victory for General Motors, Bank of America, and other issuers that urged the commission to bar proposals to allow investors to nominate board candidates to appear on corporate proxy statements. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC ("Appellant") appeals the bankruptcy court's order overruling its objection to confirmation of Mark and Kimberly Taranto's ("Debtors") proposed second amended chapter 13 plan. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Falwell (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this service mark specimen of use: In re Health Fusion Brands, Inc (TTABlog) [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:01 pm
The first of two criminal cases involving Halal food exports, United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:00 am
Trinity v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:37 pm
In Americas Mining Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Having recently marked the forty-fifth anniversary of the Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
