Search for: "Counts v. Social Security Administration"
Results 181 - 200
of 376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:27 am
More fundamentally, it's doubtful that moving to a central-count system would solve the security issues identified. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
#7: Social Media Exceptionalism. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:35 pm
From Myles v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:05 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:58 pm
Kickbacks like these were illegal until 1986, when Congress amended the Social Security Act's "anti-kickback" provisions to create exceptions for vendors' payments to GPOs. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
It also established this important agency I’m honored to chair, the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
Section II of this report details the Office's investigation of the Russian social media campaign. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
As of November 2021, the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee advanced bipartisan legislation that would implement other protections for inspectors general, though not the good-cause removal requirement. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am
I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings: In U.S. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Further, these problems can have major impacts – financial, physical, mental, and social. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The 2021 Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 8:52 pm
See Curry v. [read post]
