Search for: "County of Santa Clara v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, holding that state courts retain concurrent jurisdiction for liability actions under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:26 pm
Things turned nasty and both sides moved for sanctions.In a tentative order filed Thursday (see Page 31 of this pdf) , Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Socrates "Pete" Manoukian rejected both sides' request for sanctions. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:44 am
Symantec Wins Dismissal in Say-on-Pay Litigation 2.0 Here's an excerpt from Latham's Jim Barrall's news over on "The Conference Board Blog": In a very important development in the current proxy disclosure litigation wars relating to annual meeting votes, last Thursday the Santa Clara County Superior Court sustained Symantec Corporation's demurrer in Natalie Gordon vs. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
The case, County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
" In the second case, decided on August 7, a panel of the California Court of Appeal reversed a decision by the Santa Clara Superior Court and revived a claim of anti-gay employment discrimination by Carl Williams, who had been employed as a network engineer by Sun Microsystems. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
Apple retains the right to withdraw from the settlement in the event an excessive number of requests for exclusion are received.The Court will hold a hearing in this case (Johnson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Web: http://www.sacalz.org California State University, Northridge Monterey Hall, 18111 Nordhoff Street Northridge, CA 91330 Phone: (818) 677-4404 Fax: (818) 677-4407 Web: http://www.alzla.org Monterey County Chapter 182 El Dorado Street Monterey, CA 93940 Phone: (831) 647-9890; (800) 660-1993 (Toll Free) Fax: (831) 655-9241 North Bay Chapter 4340 Redwood Highway, Suite 23 San Rafael, CA 94903 Phone: (415) 472-4340; (800) 660-1993 (Toll Free) Fax: (415) 472-4350 Orange… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
County of Santa Clara The controversy was reignited in part by the United States Supreme Court’s recent refusal to hear the appeal of a California Supreme Court decision holding that the government can hire private attorneys on a contingenct basis under certain circumstances. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 50.) [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
For example, a false statement made in a court filing is subject to the absolute privilege. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Superior Court (Santa Clara County), the Court faced the issue of whether a bankrupt company could maintain an action for trade secret misappropriation when that company had sold its “trade secrets” in connection with the bankruptcy. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
Superior Court, 132 Cal.App.4th 826, 833-35)). [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Iowa 2006); Santa Clara v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Superior Court, 149 Cal. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
Superior Court (Santa Clara County) (IP Law Blog) US Patent Reform The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) First to disclose: A caveat to the Patent Reform Act of 2010 (Patently-O) House leadership says it lacked ‘adequate input’ on Senate Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) Who cares about health care… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
Superior Court (Santa Clara County) (IP Law Blog) US Patent Reform The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 (Patent Baristas) (Inventive Step) (271 Patent Blog) (IP Watch) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) First to disclose: A caveat to the Patent Reform Act of 2010 (Patently-O) House leadership says it lacked ‘adequate input’ on Senate Patent Reform Bill (Patent Docs) Who cares about health care… [read post]
