Search for: "Cox v. Long" Results 181 - 200 of 433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2016, 6:44 am by Terry Hart
” The Internet’s Safe Harbor Did Not Just Become A Little Less Safe — Franklin Graves looks at the August 8 decision in BMG v Cox, where the Eastern District of Virginia upheld a jury verdict finding an ISP liable for contributory copyright infringement. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Susan Hennessey, Nicholas Weaver
At Motherboard, Joseph Cox reports that defense attorneys representing dozens of defendants nabbed in an FBI child pornography sting have pooled their resources in a “national working group. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Official description: Infringement monitoring tools and services; automated sending of notices, including notice parameters; automated processing of notices; role of human review; identification of works through fingerprinting, hash identifiers, and other technologies; filtering, including “staydown” capabilities; fair use considerations; identification and tracking of repeat infringers; and other pertinent issues. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Fontaine, President, Corporate Risk Holdings[1] take a look at these challenges and propose that in addressing their cybersecurity-related responsibilities boards should draw upon the same governance procedures they have longed used for with respect to financial accounting and reporting. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a long opinion rejecting arguments made by major business trade groups that the new NLRB union election rules exceed the NLRB’s statutory authority, are arbitrary and capricious and violate employers’ rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution. [read post]