Search for: "Cox v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:07 am
First and foremost is the Oracle v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
Disability Blog & Cases: CIGNA Life Insurance Company denies disability benefits yet social security disability benefits are approved Lily Rubinstein filed suit against CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York, Griffon Corporation Long Term Disability Plan, and Griffon Corporation Life Insurance Plan in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of New York when the insurance provider abruptly denied her disability benefits after approving short term benefits six… [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:18 am
United States, 398 U.S. 58 (1970).Even though the exemption in section 1730 is narrowly written to cover only actors' portrayals, it’s unlikely that anyone will find themselves in legal hot water over a postal-worker Halloween costume. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
" State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:27 pm
On March 24, 2000, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) designated Canada lynx as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. ? [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:39 am
The sponsors of the proposed legislation, Bob Constan and Justin Amash acknowledge they will have a very tough time to get this type of funding approved in the midst of the sustained economic downturn.Never short on resources, however, the ACLU is bringing their game, on this same issue, to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Vermont v Brillon.The ACLU's suit, and the proposed legislation have attracted national attention. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:27 am
The sponsors of the proposed legislation, Bob Constan and Justin Amash acknowledge they will have a very tough time to get this type of funding approved in the midst of the sustained economic downturn.Never short on resources, however, the ACLU is bringing their game, on this same issue, to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Vermont v Brillon.The ACLU's suit, and the proposed legislation have attracted national attention. [read post]
Robinson Reviews U.S. Supreme Court Case Roberts v. Sea-Land Services and other Work Comp Happenings
19 Mar 2012, 11:30 am
Robinson details aspects of the Supreme Court of the United States Roberts v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am
On October 23, 1987, the United States Senate held one of the most-controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in its history, when it rejected Robert Bork’s appointment. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 6:25 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
The CAAF session featured a panel hearing arguments on both sides of the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Noel Cox, The Continuing Question of Sovereignty and the Sovereign Military Order of Jerusalem, Rhodes and MaltaPaul Harpur, Regulating Multi-national Corporations through State-based Laws: Problems with Enforcing Human Rights Torts under the US Alien Tort Statute [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
Thus, in Cox v Turkey (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
