Search for: "Creed v. Creed"
Results 181 - 200
of 434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2020, 10:54 am
Mass. 1975) (3-judge court), and the one decision cited in that case, State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
", an analytical dissection of a piece of recent judicial history, SOCAN v Canadian Association of Internet Providers, by Susanna H. [read post]
15 May 2007, 5:46 pm
The only restraints which the law has imposed upon free exercise of his discretion is that he may not use race, creed, color, national origin, sex or marital status as criteria. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
Last month, in Hallanan v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
Hedge-fund ‘Fight Club’ traded illegal tips instead of punches by Bloomberg in CTpost.com The hedge-fund analysts vacationed together in the Hamptons, gambled in Las Vegas and adopted a creed that parodied the rules in the Brad Pitt film “Fight Club. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
” Interesting, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination previously held in cases such as Jette v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:31 pm
Then in 1952 the NAACP brought five cases to the Supreme Court challenging segregation and seeking to overrule Plessy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 12:30 am
This question was considered last month by the Upper Tribunal in KS (Thailand) v SSHD [2022] UKAITUR PA090582018 (unreported). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:27 am
Recently, in the case of Haddad v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 1:47 am
It's the moral commitment stated in our country's creed. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:50 am
“To insist that the government respect the separation of church and state is not to discriminate against religion; indeed, it promotes a respect for religion by refusing to single out any creed for official favor at the expense of all others,” observed Stearns in the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:08 am
According to that case, Williams v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:27 am
Recently, in the case of Haddad v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:19 am
It referred to Strasbourg case law, cited in Ladele suggesting that Article 9 “primarily protects the sphere of personal beliefs and religious creeds and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a way which is dictated by such a belief”: C v United Kingdom App 10358/83. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm
See, e.g., Tramm v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am
Miller v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:19 pm
In Lowery v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
See, e.g., Pepper v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
He referred to Rev Charles Odeke Akunya v Registered Trustees of Church of Uganda (HCCS No 305 of 2020) and Rev Canon Cyrus Adiga Nakari v Rt Rev Sabino Ocan Odoki (HCSS No 2 of 2017) and cited Justice Mubiru: “… the courts may refrain from adjudicating purely religious matters, save where the right to property or to an office depends on the questions as to religious faith, belief, doctrine or creed as the courts may be handicapped to enter into the hazardous… [read post]
