Search for: "Cross v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield" Results 181 - 200 of 351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2012, 3:09 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Northeastern Pennsylvania, 454 F.3d 120 (3d Cir. 2006), that “ERISA’s legislative history indicates that Congress intended the federal courts to construe the statutory standing requirement broadly in order to facilitate enforcement of its remedial provisions. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
The controlling provisions in the CBA provided that "[a]ll present retirees … and all members who retire in the future shall continue to receive Blue Cross, Blue Shield Major Medical Insurance coverage for themselves and their dependents (or comparable coverage as may then be in effect). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:28 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mich., Inc., 740 F.2d 423, 428 (6th Cir. 1984) (holding denial of rule 56(f) motion improper where party moving for summary judgment had not been "extremely forthcoming" with respect to document requests and interlocutory appeal had interrupted discovery); see also 10B Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:13 am
    The Court held that Powell had not met her burden to show procedural unconscionability where she did not provide evidence that she could not obtain wireless service without entering into an arbitration provision, which was one of the factors for procedural unconscionability under Blue Cross Blue Shield of Ala. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:15 am by emagraken
  It is for that reason that I expect that counsel have included in the book of authorities Blue Line Hockey Acquisition Co., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
  The complaint alleged that Baptist Health conspired with Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield to restrain trade in, and to monopolize, the market for “cardiology services for privately insured patients in a 16 county area of central Arkansas. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:32 am
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New JerseyINSURANCE LAW - Class-Action Settlement"In determining whether a proposed settlement of a class action is fair and reasonable, the trial court must conduct a fairness hearing pursuant to Rule 4:32-2(e). [read post]
” In this case, the plaintiff was a transgender woman denied coverage under the Houston County Sheriff’s Office health insurance plan (a self-insured plan administered by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield) for gender-affirming care prescribed for her gender dysphoria diagnosis. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
The principal rationales for the doctrine include: (1) assuring the enforceability of any decision that may be rendered against the fugitive; (2) imposing a penalty for flouting the judicial process; (3) discouraging flights from justice and promoting the efficient operation of the courts; and (4) avoiding prejudice to the non-fugitive party (Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield v Finkelstein, 111 F3d 278, 280 [2d Cir 1997]). . . [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
In 1996, the city advised its retirees that commencing January 1, 1997, their health insurance coverage would be changed to the Blue Choice Extended Plan from the Blue Cross-Blue Shield Preferred Blue Million.According to the ruling, Blue Choice Extended Plan “indisputably affords inferior coverage to that provided in previous years. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:01 pm by Ron Coleman
The potential injury to the children from disclosure of their postings, she ruled, did not outweigh Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey’s need for the information. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:09 am by Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C.
  In fact, the Alabama Supreme Court, in Roberts v Univ. of Alabama Hospital, held that the amounts a hospital accepts as full payment from Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Medicare and Medicaid are not relevant when considering whether the hospital’s charges are reasonable. [read post]