Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 16,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm
It is also broadly consistent with the Supreme Court's June 2023 8-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:36 pm
ChileSáez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:50 am
InFederman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Asa result, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment andDENIES the Government’s motion to dismiss and alternative cross-motion forsummary judgment.I. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
In National Small Business United v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:10 pm
The trial (Liberty v SSHD) is expected to run for two days at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
As we talked, they pondered when their country had crossed the Rubicon? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm
Court Decisions on Cross-Plan Offsetting In Peterson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
On February 20, 2024, the New York Court of Appeals handed down its opinion in Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
A broad cross-ideological array of economists and land-use scholars have concluded that it is responsible for massive housing shortages in many parts of the United States, thereby cutting off millions of people – particularly the poor and minorities – from economic and social opportunities. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
§ 706(2)(C) (stating that courts must “set aside agency action” if found to be “in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right”). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm
Freshub, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
However, in the case of Dong v. [read post]
