Search for: "Cruz v. New York" Results 181 - 200 of 248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by Steven G. Pearl
On the other hand, there is Cruz v Dollar Tree Stores Inc., Nos. 07-2050 SC, 07-4012 SC (N.D. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
After he did some legal work for Ivette De La Cruz, attorney Neil Hirschfeld was supposedly directed by the New York County Surrogate's Court to make his request for compensation in that forum. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:52 am by James Bickford
The Santa Cruz Sentinel reports on Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
I. v New York City Bd. of Educ., 256 AD2d 189; McDonald v Cook, 252 AD2d 302; and Lemp v Lewis, 226 AD2d 907, in support of its ruling. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am by Gareth
-v- Ainsworth & Anor. [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, summarized in my article “Not so long ago, in a courtroom not so far away…“), but not all Courts agree:  California assumed the personal jurisdiction in Lucasfilm which the Court of Appeal rejected, and more recently the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (on an appeal from the Southern District of New York) suggested, without having to decide, that even the sale of a single item via the Internet… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Approximately one million dogs and cats enter California’s shelters each year, and over half of them are euthanized simply because there are not enough homes.SB 250, based on successful laws in Santa Cruz and New York City, provides a reasonable, fiscally-responsible step towards reducing pet overpopulation in California. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” In the news from the lower courts, the Tenth Circuit in Ernest Eugene Phillips v Workman grants habeas relief on a Beck claim. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am by Sean Wajert
Cruz, 698 P.2d 315 (Idaho 1984); Goldberg v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 2:38 am by SHG
In sum, the plaintiffs version of the events was "manifestly untrue, physically impossible, or contrary to common experience, and such testimony should be disregarded as being without evidentiary value" (Cruz v New York City Tr. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
Walker, J.) conducted a framed-issue hearing on the issue of whether the striking vehicle was in fact stolen or was being operated with Cruz's permission and ruled that Cruz and his auto insurer failed to submit sufficient evidence to overcome the presumption of permissive use that derives from New York Vehicle & Traffic Law § 388. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am by Michael Ginsborg
(NCLR Out for Justice / Santa Cruz Sentinel)AdoptionThe Louisiana Attorney General has requested reconsideration in a 5th Circuit ruling that requires the state to recognize a New York court decree of adoption by gay parents. [read post]