Search for: "D&S Charters LLC" Results 181 - 200 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Frescati Shipping Company 13-462Issue: (1) Whether a safe berth provision in a voyage charter contract is a guarantee of the safety of the berth, rather than a duty of due diligence, and whether such a contractual provision runs to the benefit of a third-party vessel owner when there is no evidence of the contracting parties’ intent to benefit the vessel owner; and (2) whether a wharf owner’s tort duty to provide a safe approach extends to routes selected… [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm by Marcia Delgadillo
We’d also like to highlight the promotion of Frank J. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
The French Conseil d'Etat ordered the State to pay French Internet Access Provider Bouygues Telecom the sum of €26,100 as compensation for costs it had met under so-called 2009 graduated response system overseen by HADOPI, under which a series of warnings are issued by HADOPI  to infringers using peer-to-peer networks to unlawfully share protected content. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK INTERNATIONAL (AMERICAS) LIMITED and STANCHART SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Apr. 11, 2019), rev’d in part on other grounds, No. 18-CV-2933, 2019 WL 3409684 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]