Search for: "D. (D.) VS. S. (A.), ET AL."
Results 181 - 200
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
Mohr, et. al. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:02 pm
It’s hard to see anything really turning on (a) (the 36 vs 48 hours question). [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:14 pm
The ruling was made on January 18, 2008 in the matter Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
En este marco aparecen referencias normativas ecológicas más específicas sobre el Derecho al Agua (que la Corte ya había explicitado en casos como "Kersich", y ahora sustenta en jurisprudencia de la Corte IDH, Yakye Axa vs. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, Barry et al.(1990); Hochberg (2012), Celikyurt et al. (2014), and Iliev and Lowry (2020) show that venture capitalists maintain board influence well beyond a firm’s IPO. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Lenovo International, et. al. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG) Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Bolton fue resuelto el mismo día y las opiniones deben leerse juntas (y, de hecho, se "citan" entre si). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Nike, Inc. et al. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
It’s really good and it’s free. [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:21 am
UCF ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondent. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
OSCAR VARGAS, ET AL. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
PEARLMAN, et al., Debtor. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The authors nonetheless recommended the full battery because the latter tests provide some measure of performance impairment (vs. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
Section 2601, et al., and 53 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:00 pm
Following a November 1, 2018 federal district court order in American Hospital Association [AHA], et al., vs. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Dickinson Wright and John Artz (Patently-O) (PharmaPatents) BPAI: Removing terminal disclaimers by patent reissue: Ex parte Shunpei Yamazaki (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Equitable intervening rights: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
