Search for: "D. Smith" Results 181 - 200 of 9,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am by Samuel Bray
And if you wish you'd taken Remedies in law school, this is a plate of hors d'oeuvres that might whet your appetite to study it for yourself. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The ITC argues that Apple has not “demonstrate[d] the two most important factors in granting a stay—likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
Today's DJS has Retired 4th District justice joins growing appellate boutique -- Retired justice Patricia D. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to get feedback on the list, and I think your readership is the best place to get that feedback. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am by Norman L. Eisen
FRAP 41(d)(1) (“A party may move to stay the mandate pending the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:16 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frances D’Emilio reports for AP News. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
"La entrada de las versiones originales de Mickey y Minnie al dominio público es notable, no solo por la popularidad de los personajes, sino también porque ésta se aplazó por casi cuatro décadas", escribe la licenciada Carolene Fontanet Smith (Saldaña, Carvajal & Vélez-Rivé, PSC). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period July through December 2023. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
“They did this,” he continued, “because they had been fed wild falsehoods by the most powerful man on Earth — because he was angry he’d lost an election. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]