Search for: "D. Sharp v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Should we say we’d rather have ex ante thinking about these definitions and a legislative approach that limits discretion or leave it to common law? [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-1276, and Ziglar v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 pm by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court denied automotive supplier Continental's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the Avanci patent pool firm and several of its members (Nokia, Sharp, Conversant, Optis). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:39 am by Orin S. Kerr
  You might ask if Kansas's approach is a sharp outlier from prevailing trends in state law approaches to the insanity defense. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Canada  In the case of Huff v Zuk, 2019 ABQB 691 K D Nixon J awarded the plaintiff defamation damages of $50,000 in action between two dentists. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root previews the Supreme Court’s next big Fourth Amendment case, Kansas v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul C. Light
I’d retire today if it were not for the retirement personnel being furloughed. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am by Florian Mueller
The defendants would like to escape her jurisdiction by means of a transfer to the Northern District of Texas, and Continental's motion for an antisuit injunction has been fully briefed (in other posts I discussed Nokia's German anti-antisuit injunction and Continental's reply brief, which mentions five German Sharp v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:39 pm by Florian Mueller
If Avanci and Nokia got their way, they'd be in the Fifth Circuit, and they could at least make an argument based on Judge Rodney Gilstrap's HTC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, promises not to speak are legally binding (see Cohen v. [read post]