Search for: "DOE et al v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:12 am
" Here's the order (my commentary continues below the document, where I'll also provide an updated timeline chart):DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Kreder, Jennifer Anglim et al. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
The negative product impacts of PSCs contrast with the findings of other papers that traditional short selling can improve corporate performance through disciplining managers (e.g., Chang et al., 2019; Fang et al., 2016; He and Tian, 2016; Grullon et al., 2015; Massa et al., 2015). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:56 am
[6] See Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 4:02 am
Interprofession du Gruyère et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 12:28 pm
[FN28: United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
Howell et al – United States District Court – District of Utah – February 23, 2023) involves a Receiver’s action against the defendants to recover assets obtained from an alleged Ponzi scheme related to rare coins. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:01 am
Merrick Garland, et. al, Case No. 4:2022-cv-02396 S.D. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm
United States and Shoop v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
Why, as you write in this amicus brief, is President Biden’s decision to forgive $400 billion worth of student loans an epochal change in the history of United States domestic programs? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:52 am
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Pennsylvania – February 23, 2023) involves a drug product liability claim. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The motion proposes an evidentiary hearing over this issue.This is only the latest example of United States et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm
"Although Adams does not represent the plaintiff in Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
In both Gonzalez and Taamneh, the Solicitor General will also be arguing on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Federal Republic of Germany, et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
