Search for: "David Pozen"
Results 181 - 200
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 12:47 pm
They include Arnold & Porter partner William Baer; Seth Bloom, general counsel to the Senate’s antitrust subcommittee; Sharis Pozen, Varney’s principal deputy; and Dewey & LeBoeuf partner David Turetsky, among others. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
Pozen’s article, Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism, by Professor Neal Devins of William & Mary Law School and Nicole Mansker and a reply to that response by the original author, David Pozen. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
Pozen’s article, Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism, by Professor Neal Devins of William & Mary Law School and Nicole Mansker and a reply to that response by the original author, David Pozen. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:31 am
David Pozen has recently posted “What Happened in Iowa” on SSRN. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:30 pm
David Pozen has posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Columbia Law Review Sidebar). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:45 pm
David Pozen has posted What Happened in Iowa? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:01 am
David Pozen has posted Justice Stevens and the Obligations of Judgment (Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 101, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:48 pm
Such data gathering should not be what David Pozen calls a “deep secret;” that is, citizens should not be “in the dark about the fact that they are being kept in the dark. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:25 am
Davis Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism David E. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:43 am
David Pozen recently published his second article on judicial elections in the pages of the Columbia Law Review. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
David Pozen has posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Columbia Law Review). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:29 am
David Pozen has posted Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism (Columbia Law Review, Vol. 110, No. 8, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:26 am
And while David A. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
Writing in the Stanford Law Review, another professor, David Engel, [2] precisely articulated the standards to which corporations would need to subscribe in order to legitimate this unregulated power within a democratic society: Disclose fully the impact of their operations on society Obey the law Restrain their impact on government– both elections and administration Today, we are surrounded by the wreckage of this seemingly noble experiment. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 11:28 pm
Stanford Law Review, Issue 62:2 (January 2010) ARTICLES Deep Secrecy David E. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am
David Pozen has posted Deep Secrecy (Stanford Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:14 am
David Pozen (Yale 2007 / Garland) Justice Antonin Scalia 1. [read post]
2 May 2008, 2:16 pm
I missed passing this along earlier, but he wrote the Foreward to a report issued in April by the Brennan Center published its report about using heightened recusal standards to reduce concerns about judicial election and selection: “Fair Courts: Setting Recusal Standards” by James Sample, David Pozen, and Michael Young. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:24 pm
**James Sample, David, Pozen, Michael Young, "Fair Courts: Setting Recusal Standards", Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law (April 2008). [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
David Pozen (Heyman Fellow, Yale Law School) has published Hidden Foreign Aid, 8 Fla. [read post]
