Search for: "David Bader"
Results 181 - 200
of 889
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, dissented. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
In a New York Times column, David Leonhardt analyzed a recent report from the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
The court takes the bench, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is wearing the black-jeweled jabot that she favors for reading dissents from the bench. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:36 pm
Early coverage comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; David Savage of The Los Angeles Times; Lawrence Hurley of Reuters; Jessica Gresko of the AP; Greg Stohr of Bloomberg; Ariance de Vogue and Veronica Stracqualursi of CNN; and Antonia Blumberg and Marina Fang of HuffPost, Fang wrote separately about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 am
Editor’s Note: this post was updated at 1:43 p.m. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:55 am
The more liberal coalitions included Justices David Souter, John Paul Stevens, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer until 2009, then Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Stevens, Ginsburg and Breyer in 2009, and Sotomayor, Justice Elena Kagan, Ginsburg and Breyer for the 2010 term forward. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
By a vote of 9-0, and with an opinion written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court answered that question in the negative. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Coverage comes from Jon Hill of Law360, Brandi Buchman of Courthouse News Service and Tony Mauro of the The National Law Journal (registration may be required), who reports that the “rare pro-consumer ruling in a class action was even more unusual because of the uncommon allies who joined Thomas: liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm
Representing Newton, David Frederick argued that the 9th Circuit’s approach to the statute was truer to its language while still maintaining a proper federal/state balance. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “Wedding cakes and same-sex marriages are back before the Supreme Court, and this time the justices are being asked to rule broadly that the 1st Amendment’s protection of the ‘free exercise’ of religion shields conservative Christians from state civil rights laws. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Neither Ruth Bader Ginsburg or, for that matter, Jack Balkin, calls for a liberal judicial crusade against Republican tax and trade policies. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:08 am
The next justice to join the Supreme Court was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 2:58 am
[Jacob Sullum] New Zealand declares it a crime to possess or distribute manifesto of Christchurch mass murderer, begins filing charges against persons who shared on social media [Charlotte Graham-McLay, New York Times via Josh Blackman, Tripti Lahiri/Quartz] Airport concession flap appears to set up a First Amendment case that Chick-fil-A would win, should it choose to pursue its rights against the city of San Antonio [KSAT, Hans Bader] Courts take seriously the doctrine of First… [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:06 am
By contrast, David Frederick, for seaman Christopher Batterton, argued that general maritime law made punitive damages available based in part on the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in 2009 in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:26 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, which Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer joined. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:46 am
” At Law.com, David Ogden weighs in on Flowers v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 8:40 am
Also, Thomas’ and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s frequencies are based on over 1,000 votes apiece. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
” Briefly: At AP, Mark Sherman reports that after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered two of the Supreme Court’s three opinions yesterday, “[n]ow we know what [she] was doing as she recuperated from lung cancer surgery: churning out opinions for the court at a faster clip than any of her younger colleagues. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
“This is industry’s holy grail,” George Washington University’s David Michaels reportedly said. [read post]
