Search for: "David J. Simon"
Results 181 - 200
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2008, 3:04 pm
Farr Professor of Law J. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
On 22 June 2016, Sir David Eady heard applications in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am
Joshua Rozenberg also has a piece about the Simon Singh case in Standpoint magazine. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Deardorff.Schultz, David A. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm
., Simon Hoggart suggested in the Guardian that MPs had got their chance to hit back at tabloid press that has been tormenting them for years. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
A Preliminary Review of the Evidence Posted by David J. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
The accusations were made by David Sherborne, Counsel for 17 claimants suing News UK. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
In The Paris Review, Joshua J. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
On the same day there was a hearing in David Kezerashvili v BBC KB-2024-00094. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Individuals included John Motson and journalist Simon Hoggart, as Jon Slattery reports here. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Brown J. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
Dirk Voorhoof and Daniel Simons also considered the significance of the case in an Inforrm post. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm
This evidence chimes with the assessment of David Axelrod, the American political consultant and Obama adviser. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
See David Hart QC’s commentary to this case here. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Witness(es): David Anderson QC. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
David Allen Green reports here for the New Statesman. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
“Freedom of Speech, Defamation and Injunctions” by David S Ardia, SSRN Abstract. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:31 am
There are comments about the discussion document by campaign supporters Simon Singh and David Allen Green. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Cohen that included David C. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 2:32 am
In order to circumvent this power wielded by the Board, Simon-Whelan alleged a conspiracy to monopolize and restrain trade.[12] On the plausibility of the antitrust allegations, the court agreed with Simon-Whelan’s claims. [read post]
