Search for: "Davis v. State of North Carolina"
Results 181 - 200
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 10:59 am
The new policy was prompted in part by an investigation by Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights and a report by the California State Auditor.The policy states in relevant parts:H. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
She dialed 911 after finding her daughter beaten to death in the driveway of their North Carolina home. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:10 pm
North Carolina, No. 15-1194, argued February 27. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
University of North Carolina. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Florida, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in its 2019 Rucho v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Davis 14-197Issue: Whether Miller v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:43 pm
The case is Port v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:15 am
But more importantly, Indiana taught states like Montana, Nevada, Georgia, North Carolina, and Maine that the public will not countenance discrimination, no matter what its form or disguise. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
The Racial Justice Act and the long struggle with race and the death penalty in North Carolina 88 N C Law Rev 2031 (2010). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
In Davis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
In Louisiana v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
North Carolina last term. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The big news is that the court has relisted North Carolina v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Teston, University of Idaho: Defining “clinical meaningfulness” in FDA cancer-care hearings Belinda Walzer, University of North Carolina-Greensboro: What Are The Alternatives? [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Teston, University of Idaho: Defining “clinical meaningfulness” in FDA cancer-care hearings Belinda Walzer, University of North Carolina-Greensboro: What Are The Alternatives? [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
North Carolina argument 1/20/2010 Kucana v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
In fact, the Court in 1986 in Davis v. [read post]
