Search for: "Day v. Rivera"
Results 181 - 200
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Caret v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
Rivera-Martinez, 2021 VT 96. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
” Marissa Rivera and Michael Chou preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
" Referencing the longstanding, basic rules of statutory interpretation, the Court of Appeals said that in such matters a court's "primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the [l]egislature", citing Samiento v World Yacht Inc., 10 NY3d 70. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
" Referencing the longstanding, basic rules of statutory interpretation, the Court of Appeals said that in such matters a court's "primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the [l]egislature", citing Samiento v World Yacht Inc., 10 NY3d 70. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm
Lastly, the majority ruled both retaliation claims failed because the plaintiffs did not demonstrate that the allegedly adverse employment actions were causally related to any protected conduct (Abril-Rivera v Johnson, July 30, 2015, Lynch, S; to be reported at 99 EPD ¶45,357). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
On January 24, 2022 — the day before the 15-day deadline but more than one month before the February 28, 2022 deadline— the IRC announced that it was deadlocked and, as a result, would not present a second plan to the legislature. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
On January 24, 2022 — the day before the 15-day deadline but more than one month before the February 28, 2022 deadline— the IRC announced that it was deadlocked and, as a result, would not present a second plan to the legislature. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 11:00 am
Escobar et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:56 am
After having taken into account the previously undisclosed attorneys’ fees already paid to plaintiffs’ counsel by the Mexican government, the court also found the $386,145 to be paid from the settlement fund for attorneys’ fees, costs, and litigation expenses to be fair and reasonable (Rivera v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 10:41 am
Richards v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
Rivera v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:40 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 3:32 am
So at the end of the day, it boiled down to a simple cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 708,). [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
