Search for: "Dean v. Jones" Results 181 - 200 of 223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2009, 2:08 pm
Brotherhood of Locomative Engineers and joined Judge Posner’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in Jones v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:25 am
Goord, 345 F.3d 121 (2d Cir., 2003) [Lexis link].In Jones v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
United States (drug felony, misdemeanor, facilitate, cellular phone) Dean, Christopher M. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2009)Affirming that multiple plaintiff claims of discrimination etc were frivolous and that a plaintiff's attorney engaged in sanctionable conduct; remanded $660K+ atty fees order for more refined computation of amounts>> Noted here: Central Ohio Employment Law Update7th Circuit>> Jones v City of Springfield, No. 08-2085 (7th cir. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
State, 885 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 2004) .............................................................................. 4 Jones v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
June 23, 2008) .................................... 3-4, 15-16 Jones v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
State, 885 So.2d 338 (Fla. 2004) .................5, 15 Jones v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:46 pm
As noted in an article by Floyd Norris of the New York Times, a panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in Jones v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:39 pm
Today I was surprised by two results -- first when my Terps upset No. 1 UNC at the Dean Dome and second when I read CAAF's summary disposition from Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
On November 9, 2007, the appellant filed a successive motion to vacate judgment and sentence pursuant to Fl.R.Cr.P. 3.851(e)(2) based on "new evidence truly demonstrating that Schwab could not control his conduct" which, under Jones v. [read post]