Search for: "Deborah Pearlstein"
Results 181 - 197
of 197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2008, 4:42 pm
That's what's so ludicrous about the suggestion, made by Slate's Deborah Pearlstein and others, that he's somehow flunking his academic duties by filling his students with one-sided propaganda. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:31 am
As my colleague Deborah Pearlstein points out, we wouldn't accept that result in molecular biology or medicine or many other disciplines. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:16 am
My thanks to Deborah Pearlstein for her thoughtful reply which illustrates well the professional disregard for both women and family in academia as well the law firm and corporate contexts, though by virtue of de facto independent contractor status of most professors, the groves of academe are sweet compared to the bitter hardships borne by single moms. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:57 am
While you're all anxiously awaiting my March Through the Torture Memo, you'd be advised to spend some time checking out the posts over on Slate's new Convictions blog, where my colleagues such as Emily Bazelon, Dawn Johnsen and Deborah Pearlstein are highlighting some of the most important aspects. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Deborah Pearlstein asks about the Munaf/Omar case being argued on Tuesday: "On the foreign affairs and the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:07 am
Putting on my doctrinalist's hat, rather than my historian's hat, I was nonplussed by Deborah Pearlstein's casual statement that if we recognized a fundamental right to keep and bear arms "that citizens would be able to carry guns with them pretty much anywhere, anyplace, for any reason. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 6:21 am
In response to my post on the purposes behind the Fourteenth Amendment and the light they shed on the right to keep and bear arms, Deborah Pearlstein says she "need[s] some help understanding the evidentiary weight I should accord Senator Howard's remarks about the Fourteenth Amendment to our understanding of the meaning of Second. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 2:17 am
In response to my post on the purposes behind the Fourteenth Amendment and the light they shed on the right to keep and bear arms, Deborah Pearlstein says she "need[s] some help understanding the evidentiary weight I should accord Senator Howard's remarks about the Fourteenth Amendment to our understanding of the meaning of Second. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 5:05 pm
[Deborah Pearlstein] Can't wait to read the Obama posts, but first thanks to Jack for the interesting post about the nature of constitutional rights, fundamental and otherwise. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 11:40 am
Deborah Pearlstein asks what evidence we have that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right of the same kind as other fundamental rights, such as the other rights mentioned in the Bill of Rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
[Deborah Pearlstein] Reading Dahlia's account of yesterday's oral arguments in the big gun case reminds me why it was my co-clerks and I would read coverage by Linda and Dahlia the morning after arguments at the Court and call it a day (as far as non-work reading went). [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:15 am
Deborah Pearlstein asks what evidence we have that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right of the same kind as other fundamental rights, such as those mentioned in the Bill of Rights. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:34 am
" As noted above, the Graham amendment solves that statutory objection.)Readers may be interested in the report from an event I co-organized (with Balkinization blogger Kim Lane Scheppele as well as Deborah Pearlstein; another Balkinization blogger, Scott Horton, played an important role) at Princeton University this past summer under the auspices of the Program in Law & Public Affairs. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:40 am
Deborah N. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 4:30 am
" Deborah Pearlstein has this essay online at The American Prospect. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 11:48 pm
Deborah Pearlstein, a lawyer with Human Rights First who has consulted with Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 11:10 am
.“Our clients’ case is about ensuring that there’s meaningful accountability, to create an effective deterrent against future violations and to ensure the courts’ ongoing role in enforcing the law against torture,” said Deborah Pearlstein, director of Human Rights First’s Law and Security program. “The Supreme Court has made it clear that wartime does not create a law-free zone.” Rumsfeld moved to dismiss the lawsuit, hence, the… [read post]
