Search for: "Dennis v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2016, 9:40 am
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) is the primary code-book that includes thousands of classifications and a tariff rate (typically ad valorem). [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:28 am
by Dennis Crouch On Patently-O, our primary focus is patent law, but sometimes we remember that the “Patent Office” is actually the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:30 am
For more on this topic, including the story of the one published legal opinion involving moon-rock ownership, see "United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:56 am
By Dennis Crouch Xitronix Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:11 am
By Dennis Crouch i4i Limited Partnership v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:04 am
That’s what one commenter asks over here at Metafilter, about the implications of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:25 am
On November 6, 2018, the United States Supreme Court answered that question the case Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 1:54 pm
Golden State Advert. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Wallace, United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 2:53 pm
United States, 179 U.S. 77, 84 (1900). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit’s recent 2-1 decision in Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:38 pm
United States, 179 U.S. 77, 84 (1900). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
By Dennis Crouch Bowman v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
We’re referring to Dennis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (Three good questions): Whether Administrative Patent Judges of the [PTAB] are principal Officers of the United States who must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
