Search for: "Department of Commerce v. United States House of Representatives" Results 181 - 200 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
United States that the US CVD law didn't apply to NME imports - for a rehearing. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
” The Texas State House of Representatives passed SB4, a bill that would make it a misdemeanor to cross from Mexico to Texas illegally. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
Hours of Service Regulations The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”), which falls under the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”), is responsible for developing and enforcing Hours of Service (“HOS”) regulations for the trucking industry. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Ana Popovich
House of Representatives Committees on Energy and Commerce and Oversight and Reform and the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
" The Washington Post reports that a state sponsor of terrorism is already attempting to obtain these guns. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am by Terry Hart
The good news is that, for the most part, the legal framework both in the United States and internationally recognizes these principles. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am by Steven Hansen
EFFECTIVE DATE.AN ACTTo provide the Consumer Product Safety Commission with greater authority and discretion in enforcing the consumer product safety laws, and for other purposes.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]