Search for: "Detroit Board of Education" Results 181 - 200 of 440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Detroit Board of Education, the 1977 decision that allowed compulsory dues to public-employee unions for non-political purposes. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:51 am by Steven M. Gursten
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Michael Kimberly
Detroit Board of Education, the question whether compulsory agency fees violate the First Amendment would be a challenging one. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am by Inimai Chettiar
Board of Education, the Court ruled that the government must end unequal application of the law and has an affirmative constitutional obligation to end racial disparities in schools. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:33 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Detroit Board of Education, the Supreme Court held that agency fees were valid as long as the nonunion employees were not required to fund the union’s political or ideological activities. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm by Lindsay Colvin Stone
Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), which permitted such fees, as a wrongly-decided imposition on individual constitutional rights. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:39 am by Steven M. Gursten
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:15 am by Steven M. Gursten
We have offices in Farmington Hills, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Detroit Board of Education should be overruled and public-sector “agency shop” arrangements invalidated under the First Amendment; and (2) whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring that employees affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:03 pm by Rich Cassidy
  And most important, it provides a limited relief process, on two levels: The UCCCA allows sentencing courts, and after sentence has been passed, an administrative body like a parole board, to issue “orders of limited relief” to assist convicted individuals with barriers to reentry caused by collateral consequences relating to employment, education, housing, public benefits, or occupational licensing. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 2:35 am
  Shigley has won multi-million dollar jury verdicts in trucking cases and lectures on trucking and insurance topics at national continuing legal education programs. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Detroit Board of Education, which authorized public-employee unions to collect agency fees from workers who don’t join the union, has the opinion. [read post]