Search for: "Development Specialists, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 am by Ronald Mann
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. presents the next one of those cases. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 6:30 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
    Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:05 pm by Anthony Zaller
Border Transportation Group, LLC, analyzes the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:05 am by Monica Williamson
DNA-People’s Legal Services, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Sarah Andropoulos
Following similar developments in Virginia and Florida, under Model Rule 7.2(c) (see new comment 9), lawyers may now state that they are “specialists” in a particular area based on experience, education, and training rather than needing a certification, provided that this assertion does not run afoul of the “false or misleading” standard articulated in Model Rule 7.1. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:00 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Once these values are developed, employees must understand what they mean and how they relate to the business. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:00 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Once these values are developed, employees must understand what they mean and how they relate to the business. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:00 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Once these values are developed, employees must understand what they mean and how they relate to the business. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am by INFORRM
  The joint judgment in two separate claims against Google, is the first time the English courts have had to rule on the application of the ‘right to be forgotten’ principle following the decision in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:48 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decisionin Spanski Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 8:47 am by James Innocent
That’s not an indictment of the technology as a whole, but rather a suggestion that SBC may have developed or imported a bad batch of the stuff. [read post]