Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. York"
Results 181 - 200
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
City of New York, 302 AD2d 183, 186-89 [1st Dept 2002].) [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:06 pm
” Doe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:55 am
Claiming drug abuse as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities ActD’Amico v Bruno, CA2, 132 F.3d 145Vito D’Amico, a New York City firefighter, complained that the Department violated the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (an anti-discrimination law that applies to federally-funded employers) when it dismissed him from his position with the Fire Department of the City of New York (NYFD) because of his use of illegal drugs. [read post]
11 May 2013, 4:00 am
O'CONNELL [General Counsel, DC-37] ATTORNEY FOR THE RESPONDENTS Firm: CORPORATION COUNSEL – City of New York Alexander W. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:41 am
Office of Disciplinary Counsel) to be applicable only to disclosures in connection with voluntary advertising or product labeling — a position the SEC asserted in it brief “was unprecedented” — it would seem surprising for the SEC to let the panel decision remain without a further challenge. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 4:44 am
Nash in New York County adopts the Second Department's holding: "Public policy dictates that courts pay particular attention to fee arrangements between attorneys and their clients, as it is important that a fee contract be fair, reasonable, and fully known and understood by the client (see Jacobson v Sassower, 66 NY2d 991, 993, 499 NYS2d 381, 489 NE2d 1283 [1985]; Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 176, 507 NYS2d 610, 499 NE2d 864 [1986];… [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
:I wanted to update you on a recent court decision relating to the rules on lawyer advertising recently adopted by the Appellate Divisions.In Alexander v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 8:15 am
Braff, an openly-gay S&C partner, as "of counsel" on the S&C v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Professions v State of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 50084(U), Supreme Court, Albany County A faculty member in the collective bargaining unit represented by United University Professions (UUP) employed by a unit of the State University of New York [SUNY] was suspended without pay pending the resolution of certain charges of misconduct filed against him. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
The legal ethics dimension of AI hit prime time with the high-profile case of a New York lawyer who included fake cases in court submissions, which he eventually acknowledged were supplied to him by ChatGPT. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Sismer 35 AD3d 1054, 1056; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon 172 AD2d 254). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
Following the hearing, defense counsel submitted memoranda of law. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
First, Floyd Norris’ business column in the New York Times today discusses a New York federal appeals court case, where the court seems poised to establish new rules on who can be convicted of insider trading. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 2:18 am
Citing Holt v Board of Educ. of Webutuck Cent. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
However, in its December 5, 2013 opinion in Venecia V. v August V., the Appellate Division, First Department, held that no malpractice had been committed, and no hearing was required to reach that conclusion. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:45 am
This one was unusual which is why I posted it.5-20-2008 New York:A New York state judge will not disturb a decision by a school superintendent to suspend a student for giving a teacher "noogies" on two occasions when she allegedly asked him to stop.In Mirenberg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 9:49 am
(Christopher Rollins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Appealing an Education Law Section 3020-a arbitration award Tarasow v NYC Dept. of Educ., 21 Misc 3d 1113(A) Helen Tarasow, a tenured a guidance counselor employed by the New York City Department [DOE], was ordered removed from her school and subsequently disciplinary charges were filed against her alleging [1] that Tarasow failed to notify school authorities and parents of a12-year-old student counseled by her that the student exhibited “intentionally made… [read post]
