Search for: "Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. US" Results 181 - 200 of 485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bexis
  We think cy pres could be the Lexecon (that is the Lexecon, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
Borland Intern., Inc., 49 F. 3d 807, 818 (1st Circuit 1995). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Google, Inc., No. 12-57302 (9th Cir. [read post]
   The Court disagreed, relying heavily upon the Federal Circuit’s decision in Distributed Solutions, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity,… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As the WSJ reported: Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc., which processes proxies for more than 12,000 U.S. companies' annual meetings, the vast majority of the market, sent out 64 million proxies in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Plaintiff Sanctioned After its “Failure to Take the Most Basic Document Preservation Steps”: In SJS Distribution Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
  These questions, among other things, find a response in High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division's ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch), which Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd) kindly reports. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
Constitution proposed to incentivize the research and distribution of innovations. [read post]