Search for: "Divine v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 686
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
In the 1990s, the Church of Scientology’s generated a string of cases in the United States, colloquially known as “Scientology versus the Internet” (referring to: Religious Technology Center v Netcom (1995); Religious Technology Center v F.A.C.T.Net Inc (1995); Religious Technonlogy Center v Lerma (1995)).To understand the significance of these cases, we must go back to an earlier dispute between the Church of Scientology and a former member --… [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
The "great clockmaker" notion of the Divine--has now been resurrected in the form of the Divine algorithm, and of the notion that a well functioning political society is defined by order and discipline. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
., NYU Press, 2019)).Kent Greenfield, Brief for Professor Kent Greenfield As Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents, State of Washington vs. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, John Cannan explains why, although “[l]egislative history is often not a foolproof method of divining legislative intent, … it provides significant clarity” in the case of Azar v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
Others say courts must interpret or divine congressional intent from those words. [read post]