Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 104,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am
Focusing on the rule text, the court concluded that Rule 10b-5(b) does not proscribe pure omissions in the absence of a misleading statement. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
Supreme Court streams live audio of oral arguments, New York is way behind the times; the official court rules for coverage of People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
They lack standing to sue.The case is Citizens United to Protect our Neighborhoods v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am
” In State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Sharr v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am
When Does the Court Consider Adequate Alternative Remedies? [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:15 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
The Supreme Court decision is Sheetz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:06 pm
It is not something the state will likely agree with, but it does show how far apart the Millers and their state are from one another. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:02 pm
In the case of A v A [2004] EWHC 142 (Fam)[Microsoft Word – 2004-EWHC-142 (thecustodyminefield.com)], the Judge included a schedule / footnote to his judgment setting out scenarios where (a) parent A can act unilaterally, (b) where parent A has a duty to consult parent B but does not need parent B’s consent, and (c) where both parent A and B must consent. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
1.SCOTUS will hear Fischer v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
In this regard, precedent from the United States Supreme Court, in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
