Search for: "Doe 35" Results 181 - 200 of 17,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Interstate 35 New Virginia, Mile Marker 37 Does Flood Wow we have a lot of flooding go on in Iowa. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:18 am by Paul Caron
Inside Higher Ed, Madison Faculty Survey Finds Widespread Bullying: Some 35 percent of faculty members who completed a survey on work-life issues at the University of Wisconsin at Madison reported having been bullied by colleagues within the last three years, The Cap Times reported. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am by Daniel Shaviro
After all, if my business pays me $100 and both its tax rate and mine are 35%, then deduction and inclusion, instead of neither, saves the business $35 of tax and costs me $35 of tax. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
  The judge reasoned that § 3553(a) is mandatory, without providing any exception for resentencings under Rule 35(b); the plain wording of Rule 35(b)(1) does not preclude considering other factors; the advisory committee notes to Rule 35(b)(1) support the conclusion; in applying Rule 35(b)(1), courts are to look for guidance to cases applying 5K1.1, which, as noted above, in this circuit apply all § 3553 factors;… [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:29 am by Buce
But the public sector does seem to be better positioned than the private sector to keep the boy-toy model alive. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:29 am by Buce
But the public sector does seem to be better positioned than the private sector to keep the boy-toy model alive. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:59 am by Docket Navigator
In a final written decision, the Board found claims of a patent directed to a portable data storage device unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:26 am by Lawrence Solum
(Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 35, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:30 am by Joseph Robinson & Robert Schaffer
§ 324(e) Does Not Bar Judicial Review of Initial USPTO Determination That Patent is for a “Covered Business Method” (Versata I); and (4) 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
§ 314 does not preclude the court from reviewing a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) finding that a petitioner is not estopped from maintaining an IPR proceeding under the IPR estoppel provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Legal Skills Prof
The Court was not pleased with the “Question Presented in the cert. petition: QUESTION PRESENTED “Does the US Constitution, in legal decisions based on 35 USC §§ 101/102/103/112, • require instantly... [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 10:14 am
" As Roger notes, SiteMeter measures traffic length on a daily basis and does not... [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:30 am by propertyprof
In Sayreville v. 35 Club, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the first amendment does not necessarily require a municipality to allow the sitting of... [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:35 am by clairesg
Nicholas Stephanopoulos on Adopting a Standard for Judging Voting District Plans clairesg Fri, 03/15/2019 - 10:35 Read more about Nicholas Stephanopoulos on Adopting a Standard for Judging Voting District Plans Wall Street Journal Jo Craven McGinty Gerrymandering When Does Political Gerrymandering Cross the Line? [read post]