Search for: "Doe VI " Results 181 - 200 of 5,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court found Harvard and UNC’s admissions policies, which considered race and ethnicity as factors in admissions, to be unlawful under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court found Harvard and UNC’s admissions policies, which considered race and ethnicity as factors in admissions, to be unlawful under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 10:30 am by David Badertscher
The Court held that Harvard College’s admissions system does not comply with the principles of the equal protection clause embodied in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 9:11 am by Justin Walsh
The court, after his arrest, ordered GS’s DNA be taken under Criminal Rule 4.7(b)(2)(vi). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:41 pm
Does anyone else think this footnote here is a bid amusing? [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:04 pm
VI, § 14), in the hope of contributing to the grand dialectical process of the common law. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part VI turns to whether the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case will also have some bearing on the fact that the law does not currently recognize that surface and groundwater are hydrologically connected. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 3:44 pm
In the Federal Rules of Evidence, we look to Article IV (Relevancy) versus Article VI (Witnesses). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid furloughs. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 11:47 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 Need for a Holistic Dispute Resolution CodeIndia does not just need a mediation legislation; rather disputes should be seen holistically and an alternative dispute resolution code (ADRC) needs to be enacted combining all methods of ADR into one legislation. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
’” Because the underlying litigation does not involve the acquisition of a subsidiary, (D)(1) does not apply. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Even when one does not fully trust police management, the best play for police accountability activists is to seek to empower them vis a vis the union.Re: Training. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:15 pm
Does the national model of presidential nomination and senatorial advice and consent provide a model worth imitating? [read post]