Search for: "Doe v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 181 - 200
of 554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
The consultation document does not, however, purport to assess the impact of its proposed regulations on the beneficial impacts. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 175l et seq.) at the school. (2) The term “public health emergency designation” means the declaration— (A) of a public health emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or another coronavirus with pandemic potential, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d); or (B) of a domestic emergency, based on an outbreak of SARS–CoV–2 or another … [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Pharmacy benefit side: now interchangeability does matter—the pharmacy needs the right to substitute w/o going back to prescriber, and the only way to get that right is interchangeability. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
“Celebrities are not allowed to use their social media influence to tout securities without appropriately disclosing their compensation. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
Social Security had indicated that this proposed rule would improve the backlog of disability cases that are waiting for hearings, but that does not seem to be backed-up by facts. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
And in her view, the Social Security Administration is even more powerful and ubiquitous than the CFPB. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court will soon hear argument on Seila Law v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
McIntyre, UCD Sutherland School of Law Does the GDPR Have Trust Issues? [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Council of Europe had a piece, and the ICO’s website also had a statement from Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am
Professor MSO/Senior Researcher in International Law and Security at the Centre for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen The Department of Political Science, in collaboration with the Faculty of Law, at the University of Copenhagen invites applications for a position as Professor MSO or Senior Researcher in international law and security at the Centre for Military Studies, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Copenhagen. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
See Koch v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 5:39 pm
Coming on the heels of the recent five-judge decision in Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v InfoTrack Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 161 (for more on which, see ‘Generic’ Implementation of an Abstract Idea is not Patentable, but Does Prior Art have Anything to Do with It?) [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
(c) After such hearing, if the court determines that placement in foster care with the relative is in the best interests of the child, the court shall direct the local commissioner of social services, pursuant to regulations of the office of children and family services, to commence an investigation of the home of the relative within twenty-four hours and thereafter expedite approval or certification of such relative, if qualified, as a foster parent. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:17 am
Haan (Washington and Lee University), on Tuesday, November 12, 2019 Tags: Corporate Social Responsibility, Legal history, No-action letters, Rule 14a-8, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder rights, Shareholder voting, Stakeholders, Supreme Court The 2019 CPA-Zicklin Index of Corporate Political Disclosure and Accountability Posted by Bruce F. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
In Szurovecz v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:20 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm
The Telegram TRO Dating back to as early as 2014, the SEC began bringing enforcement actions relating to cryptocurrency, and with its October 11, 2019 filing of SEC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
The CJEU decided that: A pre-ticked checkbox does not constitute valid cookie consent. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
The CJEU decided that: A pre-ticked checkbox does not constitute valid cookie consent. [read post]
