Search for: "Doe v. Holder"
Results 181 - 200
of 6,679
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
But the plan treats holders of insured and uninsured asbestos personal-injury claims differently. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
Failure to meet the new requirements in provisional refusals If a national trade mark office does not indicate the start and end dates or does not comply with the minimum time limit to react to a provisional refusal, WIPO will not accept the provisional refusal and inform both the national trade mark office and the IR holder of this fact (‘defective notice’, Rule 18(1)(d) Regulations). [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
If retirement eligibility was the only vesting condition, would this condition be considered satisfied for purposes of the Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K disclosures and calculation of executive compensation actually paid in the year that the holder becomes retirement eligible? [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 9:10 am
Aktiebolag v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 8:31 am
…The post Internet account holders not liable for copyright infringement: Voltage v Doe appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 3:30 am
The new CDIs address the following areas: Question 128D.14 – Awards granted in fiscal years prior to an equity restructuring (such as a spin-off) that are retained by the holder must be included in the calculation of executive compensation actually paid. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit involving PredictIt (Clarke v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 10:34 am
The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:14 am
There are two Principal Stockholders, and they each hold one of the only two Class B shares, which in turn carry the votes the holder would receive if its LLC units were converted into Class B shares. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:34 am
Importantly though, the Policy Statement does not provide any insight into the types of listings that do not meet the statutory criteria and thus would be considered anticompetitive. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:17 pm
” White v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 9:12 am
The Swedish Nokia v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
Unlike in FTC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 8:46 am
YCC 50 v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
Before August 2021, when officials did not yet anticipate a rapid Taliban advance, there was a plan for a slow, gradual evacuation of SIV holders. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:16 am
In Free Holdings v. [read post]
