Search for: "Doe v. Marshall"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,744
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
Supreme Court ruled in McLaurin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am
” The reason cited is his opinion he wrote in the 1987 case of McCleskey v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, defendants’ failure to comply with the rules concerning retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude them from recovering in quantum meruit (Frechtman v Gutterman, 140 AD3d 538,538 [1st Dept 2016]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-63 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
It’s not common at all, though, to see business dissolution proceedings play out in matrimonial court, which is why a recent decision from Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Kathleen Waterman-Marshall is so fascinating. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
An unsworn report from an expert does not constitute competent evidence to support a motion for summary judgment (see Grasso v Angerami, 79NY2d 813, 814-815 [1991]). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” She noted that, as in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
From the majority opinion, by Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, in Cargill v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am
” When does open carry cross the line? [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But does Marshall’s opinion actually qualify as “great”? [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:48 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
However, the court does recognize intervening acts as breaking the chain of causation (see: R v Tower, 2008 NSCA 3 (CanLII)). [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Perhaps we need a reminder from Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood League of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
Too bad John Marshall's did instead. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 10:16 pm
December is going to an exceptionally important month for the Ericsson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
”Camus’s argument that the more people know about capital punishment the less they support it entered American jurisprudence in Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
