Search for: "Doe v. Trump et al"
Results 181 - 200
of 354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
The letter does not specify which authorities apply in which contexts, but we speculate below. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Citing Justice Anthony Kennedy’s Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Just because a new SG does not agree with the traditional view of the United States on a legal question, however, does not mean that the government should therefore change its legal position in court—particularly not where, as here, the Trump Administration itself pressed the traditional view before an en banc court of appeals just six months earlier (reply brief here; oral argument here); and where the new view would impose greater constraints on the… [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
Just because a new SG does not agree with the traditional view of the United States on a legal question, however, does not mean that the government should therefore change its legal position in court—particularly not where, as here, the Trump Administration itself pressed the traditional view before an en banc court of appeals just six months earlier (reply brief here; oral argument here); and where the new view would impose greater constraints on the… [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
Varsity Brands, Inc, et al. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 4:55 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:17 pm
Duke, et. al, in favor of the National Venture Capital Association, an association that brought the lawsuit to challenge the government’s delay of the international entrepreneur rule. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
In Zounds Hearing Franchising, LLC et. al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The CDA does not provide a basis for refusing to enforce the Equustek Order The only case relied upon by the California court for the legal proposition that the CDA gave Google immunity from the Equustek Order is Barnes v Yahoo. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:30 pm
Today our lawyers sent a letter to Judge Daniels acknowledging an errorin footnote 82 of our amicus brief in CREW et al., v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this proclamation would be detrimental to the interests of the… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm
United States Department of Labor, et al., Case # 4:16-cv-00731-ALM, which was consolidated with Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:03 pm
Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, et al, No. 1:2016-cv-00932, (E.D. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
This Davis Polk memo explains: The case, Susquehanna International Group, LLP, et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
” The ACLU and lawyers for two military psychologists who helped develop the CIA’s post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program released a statement announcing a settlement today in Salim et al. v. [read post]
