Search for: "Doe v. United States of America et al"
Results 181 - 200
of 593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2018, 2:03 pm
Additional Resources: Washington et al v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Disgorgement does not “simply return[] the defendant to the place he would have occupied had he not broken the law,” the Court held. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am
SEGA of America, Inc., et al., No. 17-1018 Worldwide Oilfield Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:55 pm
In the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in Laurens, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 8:43 am
Cynthia Harvey, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The CDA does not provide a basis for refusing to enforce the Equustek Order The only case relied upon by the California court for the legal proposition that the CDA gave Google immunity from the Equustek Order is Barnes v Yahoo. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing Williams v Sprint/United Management Comp [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 10:38 am
The Court ruled in Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Does the notice-and-takedown process sufficiently address the reappearance of infringing material previously removed by a service provider in response to a notice? [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
Does the notice-and-takedown process sufficiently address the reappearance of infringing material previously removed by a service provider in response to a notice? [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this… [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:06 pm
Duke, et. al.) challenging the President’s postponement of the International Entrepreneur Rule. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:03 pm
Loudoun County Board of Supervisors, et al, No. 1:2016-cv-00932, (E.D. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes E. coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body, as well as on the tail, or flagellum,[2] and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied… [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
