Search for: "Doe v. University of Kentucky"
Results 181 - 200
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
This month marks the 25th anniversary of Davis v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Page Smith looks at Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:05 am
See University of Kentucky v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:55 am
Brinkley v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:55 am
Brinkley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm
Stony Brook University). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
The first problem, of course, is that Congress does not really ever preempt state law when it creates a federal IP regime. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
So what does this mean for Facebook? [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
Conover and McGaw v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
It is well-established that Congress “does not alter the fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms or ancillary provisions—it does not, one might say, hide elephants in mouseholes. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:24 am
United States and the 2011 case Kentucky v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:59 am
He attended Western Kentucky University (“W.K.U. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
Wilson, 77 Ohio St.3d 334, 336, 673 N.E.2d 1347 (1997)) Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am
Trinity Lutheran of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 3:25 am
Nor does the statute permit the LLC members to expel a member to avoid sharing the LLC’s profits with that member. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
His local draft board rejected the claim, and he appealed to the Kentucky State Appeal Board. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:35 am
Finding further that the university commenced disciplinary proceedings against him well before he indicated his intent to file a civil rights complaint, the court also affirmed summary judgment against his retaliation claim (Charalambakis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:13 am
An interesting trade mark infringement/fair use decision was delivered on 19 April from a Kentucky district court (Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. et al. v Kentucky Downs LLC & Encore Gaming) having to do, of course, with horse racing. [read post]
