Search for: "Doe v. Weld" Results 181 - 200 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(patents4life) (IPKat) Michael Punke nominates as WTO Ambassador (Intellectual Property Watch) Disney acquires Marvel – IP contention ensues (Copyfight) (IP finance)   US Patent Reform Mike Drummon, Editor-in-Chief of Inventors Digest Magazine, joins innovators for patent reform (IP Watchdog)   US Patents Litigation rumours surface over Intellectual Ventures - Picture Frame Innovations, LLC v Eastman Kodak Company et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM)… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
In any event, however, resolving the ambiguity of the language of the exclusion against Arch, the exclusion does not apply to Pav-Lak (see Belt Painting Corp. v TIG Ins. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
An employee who does not have actual knowledge of the product's potential hazard or adverse effect that caused the injury is not a sophisticated user. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
There's a certain complexity to the physician's decision-making -- what does it mean, for example, for a physician to "heed" a warning? [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Cir. 2002), citing Tualatin Electric v. [read post]