Search for: "Does 1 - 19" Results 181 - 200 of 20,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 9:48 am by James M. Nicholas
While many human resource initiatives and compliance programs have been placed on the backburner in the face of COVID-19, it does not appear that California’s sexual harassment training mandate will be one of them. [read post]
30 May 2020, 10:54 am by Jon L. Gelman
Recording a COVID-19 illness does not, of itself, mean that the employer has violated any OSHA standard. [read post]
This requirement does not apply to (1) employees who were not present during the 14 day period, (2) symptomless and fully vaccinated employees who were fully vaccinated before the outbreak, and (3) COVID-19 cases who returned to work (for 90 days after their diagnosis/start of symptoms). [read post]
This requirement does not apply to (1) employees who were not present during the 14 day period, (2) symptomless and fully vaccinated employees who were fully vaccinated before the outbreak, and (3) COVID-19 cases who returned to work (for 90 days after their diagnosis/start of symptoms). [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 4:12 pm by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
G 1/19, that admits the patentability of a computer-implemented simulation, was the second opportunity for the Enlarged Board of Appeal to rule on the assessment of the patentability of computer-implemented inventions. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:58 am
TTABlogger comment: Does this ruling disadvantage parties located on the east coast? [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:39 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Germany, Austria and France have all recently taken action by mandating respiratory protection equivalent to N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and higher quality masks for workers and members of the public and have recommended enhanced ventilation in indoor settings [1–3].The United States should take similar strong actions to control the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
An employee who does not receive a timely response from the carrier or is denied benefits may file a request for arbitration so that a neutral arbitrator may review the claim. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Comitz Beethe
Joseph’s Health in Paterson, New Jersey, was quoted as saying “[a]s the pandemic intensity seems to fade, so does the adrenaline. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:52 pm by Simon Lester
In light of the above, this leads to the following observations and conclusions: The elimination of Chapter 19 does not suit producers and exporters of Mexico or the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 9:13 pm by Ali Brodie
The production of certain Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) have been delayed due to to COVID-19. [read post]